IF you are not convinced by now that:
The teachers UNION runs our education system,
The Minnesota Teachers Union is the most powerful, well-staffed (58 lobbyists, compared to 4 for the Mayo Clinic) lobby in the state,
The money rarely or NEVER reaches our children in the classrooms,
More and more money will NOT solve the problem of under- or- uneducated kids,
And IF you are tired of the never-ending demand for more and more money, with fewer and fewer positive results,
THEN
I plead with you to give FULL attention to the Brainerd Independent School District 181 appeal for a FIVE- FOLD increase in the revenue per student.
Yes, that's right. I said FIVE times the increase over today's budget- per- student.
It is time for you to ask yourself (and more importantly, the Brainerd School Board) just WHAT EXACTLY our children are getting out of this.
Sure, sure. I know. "Kids First."
Great. I agree.
But WHAT are the kids getting for YOUR tax dollars?
New programs, all aimed at
LOWERING the level of education, fewer teachers per student,
more time spent on non-English subjects,
and MORE DOLLARS spent into the coffers of the teachers' union and their lobbyists,
and into the bank books of more and more over-paid anarchists that run our schools.
TAKE BACK YOUR CHILD'S EDUCATION.
BE HONEST WITH YOURSELF.
WHEN did any taxpayer, from Minnesota or any other state, see a FIVE- FOLD increase in the educational advancement of their children?
RESIST political nonsense hiding behind the guise of "our children."
Ask more of your school board.
Better yet,
VOTE THEM OUT at the earliest convenience.
And for the children's' sake, VOTE NO on November 6th, 2007.
Saturday, October 20, 2007
Thursday, October 18, 2007
"Universal" Health Care Update from the UK
I recently listened with great interest to a radio report (CBS 10-16-07) concerning Great Britain's Universal (socialized) dental coverage.
It seems that, yes, the British do indeed have dental coverage under their socialized plan, and getting approval for work to be performed is quite easy and common.
However, getting a dentist to actually DO the work appears to be quite a problem.
Apparently, English dentists doing Government work are so backed up, it may take 2-3 years to get an appointment with them. Some people are actually pulling their own teeth with pliers, putting their crowns back on with Super Glue, or paying for another dentist out of their own pockets if they can afford to.
Just imagine: Hillary and Barack want us to have the same great coverage!!
Equally insured. Equally treated.
With equally rotten teeth.
Now THAT'S the socialism we all know! Um, ummmmmmmmmm! Makes you want to bite into a hard apple, doesn't it?
It seems that, yes, the British do indeed have dental coverage under their socialized plan, and getting approval for work to be performed is quite easy and common.
However, getting a dentist to actually DO the work appears to be quite a problem.
Apparently, English dentists doing Government work are so backed up, it may take 2-3 years to get an appointment with them. Some people are actually pulling their own teeth with pliers, putting their crowns back on with Super Glue, or paying for another dentist out of their own pockets if they can afford to.
Just imagine: Hillary and Barack want us to have the same great coverage!!
Equally insured. Equally treated.
With equally rotten teeth.
Now THAT'S the socialism we all know! Um, ummmmmmmmmm! Makes you want to bite into a hard apple, doesn't it?
Charlie Rangel: An Indecent Proposal
Rep. Charles Rangel, D-NY, has repeatedly stated that he thinks the US needs a military draft.
He says it would "more equitably spread the sacrifices" made by young soldiers.
Charlie- it's an ALL- VOLUNTARY Army.
How does an all-voluntary force serve inequitably??
Representative Rangel, GO HOME with your racist nonsense.
We all know the truth; all you want to do is initiate a draft so you can immediately declare it "racist" because only the poor, minority, blah blah blah serve in the services, blah blah blah.
Even Pelosi, the soulless wench, thinks you are a moron and has repeatedly denied you.
Get a clue.
SHUT UP AND GO HOME.
He says it would "more equitably spread the sacrifices" made by young soldiers.
Charlie- it's an ALL- VOLUNTARY Army.
How does an all-voluntary force serve inequitably??
Representative Rangel, GO HOME with your racist nonsense.
We all know the truth; all you want to do is initiate a draft so you can immediately declare it "racist" because only the poor, minority, blah blah blah serve in the services, blah blah blah.
Even Pelosi, the soulless wench, thinks you are a moron and has repeatedly denied you.
Get a clue.
SHUT UP AND GO HOME.
A Rose By Any Other Name, Part 2
Barack Obama recently said through the headlines that he favors universal health care in America. Hillary, likewise, favors her own version of the same.
You must understand; "universal" is the not-so-scary-warmer-and-fuzzier term for "socialism" in the vocabularies of folks like Obama and Hillary.
(Please see my blog post dated August 11, 2007.)
Quoting Obama, he said that Democrats, "need to cling to the core values that make them Democrats,
the belief in universal (socialized) health care,
the belief in universal (socialized) education,
and that we should be AGNOSTIC in terms of how to achieve those goals."
Let me review the term' agnostic' with you from the American Heritage dictionary:
ag·nos·tic (āg-nŏs'tĭk)
n.
1. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
2. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.
—Synonyms 1. See atheist.
These neo-socialist preachings should once and for all fix in the minds of Americans everywhere what people like Obama and H. Clinton really are:
communists.
Friends, it is Marxism-101 that tells us the communists do not RECOGNIZE GOD.
The STATE is their God.
These people actually want YOU to elect leaders who will embrace the State above any God.
Just remember what it really means when the neo-socialists use the term "universal" to describe their plans for the future.
You must understand; "universal" is the not-so-scary-warmer-and-fuzzier term for "socialism" in the vocabularies of folks like Obama and Hillary.
(Please see my blog post dated August 11, 2007.)
Quoting Obama, he said that Democrats, "need to cling to the core values that make them Democrats,
the belief in universal (socialized) health care,
the belief in universal (socialized) education,
and that we should be AGNOSTIC in terms of how to achieve those goals."
Let me review the term' agnostic' with you from the American Heritage dictionary:
ag·nos·tic (āg-nŏs'tĭk)
n.
1. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
2. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.
—Synonyms 1. See atheist.
These neo-socialist preachings should once and for all fix in the minds of Americans everywhere what people like Obama and H. Clinton really are:
communists.
Friends, it is Marxism-101 that tells us the communists do not RECOGNIZE GOD.
The STATE is their God.
These people actually want YOU to elect leaders who will embrace the State above any God.
Just remember what it really means when the neo-socialists use the term "universal" to describe their plans for the future.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Sincerity in Liberalism?
One has to question the sincerity, and therefore, the integrity of the Democrats (those Sociocrats, you know.)
The recent radio ads aimed aimed at Michele Bachmann regarding the State Children's Health Insurance Program (known as SCHIP) are a good example of how devious the liberal side is.
Bachmann voted against expansion of SCHIP, along with many other Representatives in the US House.
A liberal consortium of activist groups and unions are mounting a radio ad campaign to win her seat in Congress, based solely on her SCHIP vote.
While this in and of itself is the same as running right at the rookie linebacker making his first appearance in an NFL football game, the SCHIP ads are dangerously misleading to voters.
In order for Minnesota to rank at the level of the national SCHIP goal numbers, Minnesota would have to FALL in coverage level.
That's right.
You see, Minnesota already has a greater percentage of children with insurance than the SCHIP goal calls for. In fact, among the highest rates for insured kids in the entire nation.
The political value of Bacmann's seat in Congress is the goal here, not insured children.
The democrats are singling Michele Bachmann out for pure politics, NOT for our children's best interests.
The recent radio ads aimed aimed at Michele Bachmann regarding the State Children's Health Insurance Program (known as SCHIP) are a good example of how devious the liberal side is.
Bachmann voted against expansion of SCHIP, along with many other Representatives in the US House.
A liberal consortium of activist groups and unions are mounting a radio ad campaign to win her seat in Congress, based solely on her SCHIP vote.
While this in and of itself is the same as running right at the rookie linebacker making his first appearance in an NFL football game, the SCHIP ads are dangerously misleading to voters.
In order for Minnesota to rank at the level of the national SCHIP goal numbers, Minnesota would have to FALL in coverage level.
That's right.
You see, Minnesota already has a greater percentage of children with insurance than the SCHIP goal calls for. In fact, among the highest rates for insured kids in the entire nation.
The political value of Bacmann's seat in Congress is the goal here, not insured children.
The democrats are singling Michele Bachmann out for pure politics, NOT for our children's best interests.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)