Forgive my limited years on this planet, but wasn't there once something called "treason" in America?
Wasn't it once forbidden, and therefore illegal, to act in a seditious manner to separate America?
Weren't these kinds of acts regarded as somewhat serious offenses?
Yet within our very own United States Congress, we have Representatives from the west and southwest that have announced publicly, as Hispanic-Americans, their intentions to retake lands (in their words) stolen from Mexico and secede from the Union.
We have a U.S. Senator ( or two..) who has actively worked for the U.S. Communist party to assist in the disruption and over-throw of America.
Why are these people not charged with any crime? Once elected to Congress, just how far do you have to go in order to be considered "breaking the law?"
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
A Failure-Based Plan
The situation has worsened for the Sociocrats (Democrats) in American politics.
The signs of improvement in Iraq due to the Bush plan are evident, and the report from General Petraeus reflects positive results.
The words have barely left the Generals lips, and Sociocrats are denouncing it as "unworkable" and "irrelevant."
They have been adamant about an immediate withdrawal from the War On Terror up until this point.
Why?
Because theirs is a failure-based plan. The last thing they want is positive results in the U.S. War On Terror.
Their rhetoric has been, from the beginning, an attempt to deceive the American public that America was lied to by President Bush. That all Americans want us to unilaterally surrender in the War On Terror.
The very worst case scenario for liberals is for the U.S. to be successful in Iraq.
Think about it: the Majority party of the United States requires the U.S. to fail in Iraq in order to retain its grip as Majority party.
They do not want a successful America. Not in Iraq. Not in Afghanistan. Not in America. Not anywhere in the world. They have maintained they were "given a mandate" in the last election, and are exploiting this opportunity fully as a means to destroy America.
American success in Iraq bares the liberals publicly as the liars that they are, and their Communist agenda is exposed and becomes clear.
God Bless America. Pray for continued U.S. success.
The signs of improvement in Iraq due to the Bush plan are evident, and the report from General Petraeus reflects positive results.
The words have barely left the Generals lips, and Sociocrats are denouncing it as "unworkable" and "irrelevant."
They have been adamant about an immediate withdrawal from the War On Terror up until this point.
Why?
Because theirs is a failure-based plan. The last thing they want is positive results in the U.S. War On Terror.
Their rhetoric has been, from the beginning, an attempt to deceive the American public that America was lied to by President Bush. That all Americans want us to unilaterally surrender in the War On Terror.
The very worst case scenario for liberals is for the U.S. to be successful in Iraq.
Think about it: the Majority party of the United States requires the U.S. to fail in Iraq in order to retain its grip as Majority party.
They do not want a successful America. Not in Iraq. Not in Afghanistan. Not in America. Not anywhere in the world. They have maintained they were "given a mandate" in the last election, and are exploiting this opportunity fully as a means to destroy America.
American success in Iraq bares the liberals publicly as the liars that they are, and their Communist agenda is exposed and becomes clear.
God Bless America. Pray for continued U.S. success.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)